| |
Homebirth: What Are the Issues?
by Sara Wickham, RM, BA(Hons)
© 1999 Midwifery Today, Inc. All rights reserved.
[Editor's note: This article first
appeared in
Midwifery Today Issue 50, Summer 1999.]
There is no shortage of evidence to support the fact that homebirth
is safe, satisfying and empowering for women and their families. It is
also a much-neglected option for childbearing women in Western society
today. This article seeks to discuss modern-day attitudes about birth
and present the arguments for midwifery care and homebirth in an
accessible format.
It must be stressed that different caregivers have different
philosophies in relation to birth. These philosophies are generally
referred to as the "midwifery" and "medical" models, although it is not
accurate to say that all doctors believe in the medical model and all
midwives in the midwifery model. The medical model sees childbirth as
inherently dangerous and suggests that all women should undergo routine
interventions to ensure safety and give birth in hospital, and the
midwifery model uses a more holistic approach and assesses women on an
individual basis—a process which often enables women to give birth in
their own homes. Although the medical model has been the dominant model
of birth in our society for a number of years, researchers in all fields
are now showing the midwifery model to be more accurate in the way it
sees birth.
Many women approach a "medical model" practitioner for care during
their pregnancy, although this is not necessarily the best option. While
obstetricians and hospitals have a part to play in the care of women
with serious medical conditions or who develop a problem during
pregnancy or labour, research shows that the vast majority of women
would be better served by choosing a midwife for their care. Equally,
this majority of women would also be well advised to consider homebirth
as an option because of its many advantages over hospital care. Some of
the advantages of homebirth with a midwife are cited below.
Women Experience Less Pain at Home
It is well understood that sensations of pain in labour are regulated
by hormones released by the woman’s body. During labour, oxytocin—the
hormone which causes contractions and helps the baby be born—works in
harmony with endorphins—the body’s own pain relieving hormone. During a
homebirth, the woman’s body will release these hormones according to her
needs and she will usually cope well with the sensations of labour.
When a woman attempts to give birth in another environment such as a
hospital, however, this process may not work as well. Even if a woman
feels rationally that hospitals are "safer" places in which to give
birth, her subconscious mind knows that this is not the case, and she
feels insecure. This causes her body to secrete the hormone adrenaline,
which causes the levels of both oxytocin and endorphins to drop. She
experiences far more pain than she would in her own home, and this has
several other effects on her labour which are described below.
Women Experience Lower Levels of Intervention at Home
There are two main reasons that women experience lower levels of
intervention at home. The first concerns the hormones described above.
In a hospital environment, women often produce the hormone adrenaline in
response to subconscious or conscious fear. This inhibits the release of
the hormone oxytocin, and labour may well slow down. Although this
slowing of labour is a natural safety mechanism designed to let the
woman know she needs to find another environment, it is interpreted by
many medical professionals as "failure (of her body) to progress."
Rather than suggesting that the woman talk about her fears or find a
different environment, they will turn instead to drugs to "speed up" the
labour. This drug (usually Pitocin or Syntocinon) can cause distress in
the baby, among other effects, and often itself leads to a "cascade of
intervention" which may result in an instrumental delivery or a
cesarean.
The second reason is that hospitals are systems which need to run
efficiently. They need to have procedures in place for workers to follow
so that chaos does not ensue! Unfortunately, this often means that
hospitals have policies where a certain number of interventions are
carried out on all women who choose to give birth there. Often there is
no evidence to support these interventions, and many of them (e.g.
electronic fetal monitoring) are known to be harmful when used on a
routine basis. Every intervention is useful to a small number of women
when used appropriately, but when applied to all women, they often cause
far more harm than good. Women's choices are not sought and it is often
difficult for staff to offer individualized care, because they feel
restricted by the "hospital policy."
Women Have More Autonomy at Home
Another major difference between giving birth in your own environment
or in someone else’s is this: in your own home you are "in charge." You
would not feel you needed to ask permission to make a drink in your own
home or visit the bathroom, yet that is exactly the way many women feel
in hospital. And the effects of feeling as if they need to ask
permission to do everyday things can lead to women feeling they are not
in control. This may then have an impact on a woman’s labour, because
labour is a time when women need to feel very strong and powerful within
their own bodies, not as if they were small children who needed to ask
mommy to take them to pee!
Eating and drinking is another important aspect of this. In your own
home, you are free to eat and drink whatever you feel like. Although
women often do not feel like eating in strong labour, the choice is
there. Many hospitals still refuse women food and drink in labour, even
though all the research evidence shows that this restriction is harmful
rather than beneficial. Consequently, women become dehydrated and have
low energy levels at a time when they need lots of energy. Hospital
staff may provide an IV drip to replace fluids but this is not ideal—it
limits a woman’s movement and adds to the feeling that she is "sick"
rather than experiencing a perfectly normal event.
Other Risks of Hospital Birth
A recent article in the journal of the Association for Improvements
in Maternity Services cites a number of other risks of hospital births.
These are summarised in the following list:
- Midwives or nurses may be looking after more than one woman in
labour and individual women are not able to receive the support they
need. This can also mean they are more likely to be "tied" to fetal
monitors rather than having the midwife or nurse listen to the
baby’s heartbeat intermittently.
- Hospital birth deprives the woman of contact with her family and
friends. Being with other support people, particularly female
relatives or friends, has been shown to have a very positive effect
on labour and birth.
- Continuity of care is rare in hospitals—although you would have
the same midwives throughout a homebirth, shift changes in hospitals
mean you may see a large number of carers during your birth. Some
women report that as soon as they have built a rapport or
relationship with one carer, she goes off duty and they have to
"start all over." "Knowing your midwife" has been shown to have very
beneficial effects on labour.
- Levels of medical staff may also be low. It is a common fallacy
that being in hospital is safer "if things go wrong." In fact, as
long as you are not a huge distance from a hospital, you may well be
treated more quickly if you are transported from a homebirth than if
you were in hospital in the first place! The sort of emergencies
that need truly immediate action are extremely rare and are almost
always preceded by signs that your midwives will pick up and act
upon.
- In hospital, decisions about your labour will sometimes be made
by very junior medical staff. (You rarely have a choice about which
staff cares for you in hospital.) These people may have little
experience in birth and certainly far less than midwives who
specialise in this area. They are also unlikely to trust that your
body knows what it is doing!
- Hospital and medical care, as discussed above, takes place in
the context of a philosophy where staff are "looking for problems"
rather than ensuring that things are progressing normally. This
seemingly small difference actually makes a big difference in the
approach that different carers take to the woman and her labour and
birth. Would you rather have a carer who trusts that your body knows
what it is doing and either reassures you that all is going well or
helps you if there are any problems, or a carer who is always
checking to make sure that your body is "working" while at the same
time doubting your ability to actually give birth? As before, not
all hospital midwives or nurses take the latter attitude, but the
environment of the hospital itself tends to perpetuate this
philosophy.
Women Enjoy Increased Satisfaction with Homebirth
The proof of this pudding is in the eating, or the asking! Over 99
percent of women who have experienced both home and hospital birth will
tell you that they would choose to have a homebirth in the future. But
don’t take my word for it—ask some!
Arranging a Homebirth
If you are thinking of having your baby at home, talk to a midwife!
She will be able to tell you what is available in your area and the kind
of care she can offer you. She will also be able to help you make a
realistic assessment of whether homebirth is right for you. In general,
the only women who are truly better off in hospital are those with
chronic medical problems, such as insulin-dependent diabetes, or those
with a very small baby. But women need to be considered individually and
their unique circumstances taken into account.
Remember that in our society there are many people who do not "trust
birth" in all areas and professions, even midwifery. If you encounter
opposition to your plans, then seek a second opinion. You may have to
interview several caregivers before you find the one who is right for
you. You may also want to seek support from other women who have made
this choice.
And finally, remember that women have been having babies for millions
of years—without the aid of hospitals or medical intervention. And if
birth didn’t work, then we wouldn’t be here now! Women’s bodies are
designed to have babies. Trust your body. Trust your baby. Trust birth.
The Safety of Homebirth: Annotated References
by Sara Wickham, RM, BA(Hons)
This section outlines a number of research papers that have
sought to determine the safety of homebirth. The full reference
for each is given so that readers may be able to acquire copies
of the original if they wish. In order to help you decide
whether or not you wish to read a paper in the original, a
summary of each of the papers is included, which outlines the
nature of the research study and brief details of the research,
findings and conclusions.
Anderson, R. & Greener, D. (1991). A
descriptive analysis of home births attended by CNMs in two
nurse-midwifery services. J. Nurse-Midwifery,
36(2): 95-103.
- Analysis of outcomes of all clients who planned a
homebirth in two nurse-midwifery practices in Texas, USA.
- Women who chose homebirth were more likely to be
married, white and more educated when compared to the United
States childbearing population in general.
- The need for analgesia, episiotomy and cesarean section
was lower in this population than for hospital births.
- Complications occurred either at similar rates or were
less common than in the homebirth literature or national
statistics.
Campbell, R. & Macfarlane, A. (1986, July).
Place of delivery; a review. Brit. J Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, 93 (7): 675-683.
- These authors adjusted the mortality rate figures and
selection biases to more accurately assess the evidence
surrounding homebirth.
- They suggest that while there is no concrete evidence to
support the relationship between a fall in the perinatal
mortality rate (PMR) and homebirths, there is also no
evidence to show that hospital is safer than home for all
women.
- There is some evidence—although inconclusive—that
maternal and neonatal morbidity may be higher in hospitals,
especially consultant units.
- Perinatal mortality for women having homebirths is very
low.
- Women who have had birth in home and hospital prefer
homebirths.
Durand, A. M. (1992, March). The Safety of
Home Birth; the Farm Study. American Journal of Public
Health, 82(3): 450-453.
- Looks at outcomes of care of 1,707 women having
homebirths with lay midwives in Tennessee between 1971 and
1989, and compares these with outcomes from 14,033
physician-attended hospital deliveries derived from the 1980
US National Natality/National Fetal Mortality Survey.
- Uses rates of perinatal death, low 5-minute APGAR
scores, a composite index of labor complications, and use of
assisted delivery.
- Under certain circumstances, home-births with lay
midwives are as safe as, and need less intervention than,
physician-attended hospital deliveries.
Ford, C. et al. (1991, Dec. 14). Outcome of
planned home births in an inner city practice. Brit.
Medical Journal, 303(6816): 1517-1519.
- A retrospective study which looked at the outcome of 277
women who planned homebirths in this London practice.
- The authors used medical records to document the
outcomes, including place of birth and the timing of any
transfer to specialist care.
- Antenatally, the need for transfer to obstetrical
services was not related to parity, but primiparous women
were more likely than multiparous women to be transferred to
obstetric care during labour.
- 77.6 percent of women had a normal birth at home without
needing obstetric help.
- Postpartum problems requiring specialist attention were
uncommon among both those mothers who gave birth at home and
their babies.
[MT comment: Despite the
results of this study, the author’s statement that "close
co-operation between the general practitioner and both community
midwives and hospital obstetricians is important in minimizing
the risks of trial of labour at home" (p 1517) tells us a lot
about which practitioner these researchers see as paramount, and
the way they have approached this study in relation to their
views on homebirth.
Howe, K. A. (1988, Sept. 19). Home births in
South-West Australia. Medical J. of Australia, 149:
296-302.
- Retrospective study, undertaken by a general
practitioner, of 165 women who planned homebirth with
midwifery care. Some of the women were considered "high
risk" (e.g. VBAC, previous forceps).
- 16 percent of the women were transferred to hospital in
labour, often for "failure to progress."
- The cesarean section rate in the study group was 1.2
percent, compared to 19 percent locally at that time.
- There was one neonatal death—a baby born with unformed
lungs.
- Three cases of postpartum hemorrhage were recorded; all
of these were treated by midwives and resolved without
transfer to hospital.
- Concludes that homebirth is not only a safe option for
women, but probably safer than seeking obstetric care in
hospitals.
Olsen, O. (1997, March). Meta-analysis of
the safety of home birth. Birth, 24(1): 4-13.
- Meta-analysis of six controlled studies which examines
the safety of planned homebirth with hospital back up
compared with planned hospital birth.
- Perinatal outcomes of 24,092 women were analyzed;
measurements included Apgar scores, maternal lacerations and
intervention rates.
- Perinatal mortality was not significantly different in
the two groups.
- The homebirth group had higher Apgars and fewer
lacerations than the hospital birth group. Fewer
interventions of all types occurred in the homebirth group.
- No maternal deaths occurred in the studies.
- Homebirth is an acceptable alternative to hospital for
selected women, and leads to fewer interventions.
Tew, M. (1986, July). Do obstetric
intranatal interventions make birth safer? Brit. J.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 93(7): 659-674.
- This researcher extrapolated statistical information in
order to determine whether intranatal interventions make
birth safer. "Risk status" was taken into account.
- In all risk groups, women giving birth in hospital have
a greater chance of a stillbirth than women giving birth at
home.
- One of the reasons that some studies show the PMR rate
at home to be higher is because they include women who had
unplanned homebirth, and often no prenatal care.
- Even when unplanned transfers to hospital are taken into
account, homebirth is still safer than hospital birth.
- The fall in the PMR is not attributable to increasing
hospitalization; in fact, the PMR fell least in the years
when hospitalization increased most.
- Results from all sources consistently suggested that
obstetric intranatal interventions make birth less safe for
the vast majority of women.
Tew, M. (1990). Safer Childbirth? A
critical history of maternity care. London: Chapman and
Hall.
Tew, M. & Damstra-Wijmenga, S. (1991, June).
Safest birth attendants; recent Dutch evidence. Midwifery,
7(2): 55-63.
- Analysis of the national perinatal mortality rate (PMR)
of the 185,573 births in Holland in 1986.
- The PMR for all births is highest for doctors in
hospital (18.9 perinatal deaths per 1000 births); then
doctors at home (4.5); followed by midwives in hospital
(2.1); with the lowest rate for midwives at home (1.0).
- The authors acknowledge that there may be differences in
the "risk status" of women between care providers, which is
impossible to quantify, but argues that this alone does not
account for the higher rates of perinatal deaths for women
who had obstetric care.
[Editor's note: Sara
Wickham’s list of an additional 35 published papers on the
subject of homebirth that either comprise original research in
the area or reviews/discussions of the research is available in
Midwifery Today’s new Homebirth Pack. |
Sara Wickham, MA, BA, RM is a direct-entry midwife in Maldon,
England and a midwifery lecturer at Anglia Polytechnic University. She
is the UK country contact and a contributing editor of Midwifery Today.
Click here for
more biographical information.
|
|